On this page
THE SHORT ANSWER
An AI reading may feel accurate because it uses details you supplied, offers a broadly applicable description or helps you organize a real concern. First define what you are evaluating: reproducible calculation, a supported statement, practical usefulness or a tested prediction. These are different questions, not one accuracy score.
- Check calculation, personal resonance and usefulness separately.
- Recognizing a concern you already shared is not the discovery of an undisclosed fact.
- An accuracy percentage needs defined outcomes, data, a baseline and a validation method.
You mention overtime; the answer suggests rest.
Identical dates and conventions produce identical pillars.
You value independence and also want understanding.
The answer helps you write a message you can use.
The cards select restated context, reproducible calculation, personal resonance and practical help, with an example of each. None presents a predictive test result. The complete table below adds predictive performance and explains what evidence each of the five dimensions requires.
Feeling understood and checking a claim
Feeling understood by a sentence is a real experience. It is different from demonstrating that a system can predict future events. A description can be meaningful to you without establishing predictive validity.
Broad statements can fit many people. We also tend to remember matches more readily than misses. Fluent, reassuring AI prose does not remove these ordinary tendencies.
Keep three layers separate
The first layer is calculation: which stems and branches follow from a date and convention, or which cards were drawn. The second is a traditional symbolic association. The third is your personal connection between that symbol and an experience.
All three can be discussed, but they are not the same type of evidence. Precise calendar or astronomical data does not validate a personality or future-event prediction. Carlson’s study is one historical example of controlled testing in astrology, not a comprehensive verdict on every tradition.
Five different things to evaluate
| Dimension | Example | What it establishes |
|---|---|---|
| Restated context | You mention overtime; the answer suggests rest. | Use of supplied information, not independent discovery. |
| Reproducible calculation | Identical dates and conventions produce identical pillars. | Consistency under specified inputs, rules and software versions. |
| Personal resonance | You value independence and also want understanding. | Ask for examples and counterexamples, and how widely the description applies. |
| Practical help | The answer helps you write a message you can use. | Usefulness for a task, not prediction of the recipient’s response. |
| Predictive performance | An event is said to occur within a fixed period. | Needs predefined outcomes, complete records and a meaningful comparison baseline. |
On a small screen, scroll the table sideways.
Build a more careful reading habit
Look for visible inputs, conventions, sources and uncertainty. Ask whether a reading identifies its basis, allows disagreement and leaves decisions with you. A claim that cannot be contradicted is difficult to use as predictive evidence.
- Record misses as well as matches.
- Separate what happened, what you infer and what you hope.
- Do not pay or make major decisions in response to frightening predictions.
- When another person is involved, prefer direct communication to alleged mind-reading.
How Wenbu uses a model
Code calculates charts and performs random draws. AI receives the result with the question and context you choose to submit. It is instructed to use the calculated result and avoid invented classical quotations. Its interpretation and any references still need checking.
Technical records retain the requested and returned service versions for troubleshooting. An articulate answer can still be wrong. Concrete bug reports are welcome, with private information removed.
Check the sentence that feels most personal
If an answer says “You value independence but also want to be understood,” consider how many people it could describe. Find a specific example and a counterexample from your experience. A sentence can be useful without demonstrating that the system has identified something uniquely true about you.
Ask the Agent to separate a paragraph into inputs or calculated results, traditional meanings and inferences from your context. Have it identify any unsupported claim. The source-reading guide gives a fuller method.
Worked example: checking a sentence that feels uncannily personal
Consider this fictional reply: “You carry many responsibilities independently, yet want someone to understand you. A turning point is coming.” Review each part before accepting it.
Check your earlier messages. If you wrote that you were managing a project alone, the responsibility statement has an input source. Mark it as a summary rather than hidden insight.
Examine the broad description. Independence and wanting understanding can coexist for many people. Note a fitting example and a counterexample, such as a time you actively sought collaboration.
Ask what “turning point” means, by when, and what would count against it. Do not retrospectively turn a vague phrase into a precise prediction it never made.
Request a revision: “Separate my supplied details from general associations. Remove the unsupported future claim and give me two questions to discuss about the project.”
Keep the useful result and its limit: “I can ask which tasks a colleague could share. I have no evidence of an inevitable turning point.” Assess whether the questions help, without treating a later coincidence as validation of the entire system.
Forer’s work cautions against using personal agreement alone to validate a personality interpretation. It did not test modern AI models or establish a Wenbu accuracy rate.
Key terms
- Personal agreement
- Feeling that a description fits; this alone does not show that it distinguishes you from others.
- Baseline
- A comparison method used to judge whether a prediction adds information.
- Confabulation
- Generated content that is false, unsupported or inconsistent with the input, even when confidently expressed.
Common questions
Does a classical citation prove predictive accuracy?
It may document a traditional meaning. It still needs verification as a citation and cannot, by itself, establish a personal prediction.
Why can rephrasing change the answer?
Prompts and context influence generated interpretations. Compare their assumptions; different prose does not mean your underlying chart or future has changed.
Is there a validated personal-prediction accuracy rate for Wenbu?
This guide has no validation study supporting such a rate and reports none. Public calculation conventions and product behavior can be checked separately.
Sources and their scope
Bibliographic record for the original personal-validation study. It is historical research context, not a test of modern language models or Wenbu.
Section 2.2 describes confident false output; MS-2.5-003 calls for checking sources and citations. This is not an accuracy evaluation of Wenbu or divination.
Supports supplying calculated results and user context for symbolic interpretation; prompt rules do not guarantee correct output.
Supports the requirements to distinguish calculation, tradition and inference, and to avoid invented predictions, sources or personal history.
Further reading; not validation of real-world predictions.
Further reading; not validation of real-world predictions.
Further reading; not validation of real-world predictions.
Traditional interpretations are not established predictions. See the source notes for context.
Read this guide with your agent
Get the complete text, diagram descriptions and sources in an open format. These files contain public knowledge only.
ADDITIONAL PRACTICE · 2026-11-13
How to check a tarot reading that claims to have seen the card image
Wenbu’s built-in tarot interpretation receives structured text about the draw, including the card name, position, orientation and keywords. When a sentence says it saw a bird on a card, open the exact illustration and check it yourself. If you can see the bird, record that detail as your own observation. Keep the association on a separate line with the card name or keyword that prompted it.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
- Record the original card name, position and orientation.
- Open the same illustration and note who observed the detail.
- Revise the unsupported source claim and keep any association grounded in the record.
Check where each part of the sentence came from
- 01Read the draw
Keep the returned name, orientation and position.
- 02Inspect the illustration
Open the exact edition and locate the object mentioned.
- 03Name the evidence
Write down the text fields, who saw the picture and what the reader made of it.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
A visible detail and a claim to have seen it need separate checks
Suppose you saved the upright Star and a fictional interpretation says, “I see a bird on the upper-left branch, so I want to make room for recovery.” The first clause claims direct access to the image. The second offers a possible association. When you open Wenbu’s Star illustration, you can see a bird on a branch at the upper left. Keep the observed detail and correct the statement about who saw it.
Write down The Star, upright, single-card reflection. Then check Wenbu’s keywords Hope, renewal. These fields can support the association as a suggestion for reflection. If you only have the text of a reading, leave the picture detail unverified until you can inspect the actual card. A picture from another deck can help with a separate comparison when you name its edition.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
Rewrite the sentence as three entries you can trace
The first entry records the draw: The Star, upright. The second records the image check: I opened Wenbu’s Star card and saw a bird on the upper-left branch. The third describes an association and an action: Hope and renewal made me think about rest, so I will take a ten-minute break. These entries will still make sense when you review them tomorrow.
If the claimed object is absent, check the card name and edition first. While the picture remains unverified, remove the unsupported detail from the observations and retain the original draw. You can keep a traditional illustration detail as a separate note when you have an identified source for it. If you can verify only the text, record just the evidence you have.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
| What the sentence refers to | Evidence you can check | How to record it |
|---|---|---|
| The Star, upright | The saved draw | Card name and orientation |
| A bird on the upper-left branch | Wenbu’s Star illustration | Reader observation |
| The model says it saw the bird | The built-in interpretation received structured text | Remove the claimed observation by the model |
| Take a ten-minute break | The keywords and the reader’s own plan | Association and action |
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
Revise a line in a fictional reading
This teaching example uses a fixed single upright Star. The example sentence was written for the exercise.
- Read the saved card name and orientation, then check the keywords Hope, renewal.
- Open the full deck from the tarot tool and find The Star illustration. Look at the branch at the upper left and see whether a bird is visible.
- Write “I can see a bird on the upper-left branch” under your own observations.
- In a separate entry, record that the keywords made you think of taking a ten-minute break today.
You can now trace the draw, the image detail and the plan to their respective evidence.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
Questions you may have
Why revise the sentence if the bird really is there?
You are checking who observed it. Your own inspection can establish the bird’s presence. The built-in interpretation receives structured card text. Give the image observation to the person who actually opened it.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
What if the reading mentions a traditional symbol?
Keep it as a traditional image reference if you can identify its edition or source. Check the current illustration separately before describing it as something visible on the card you drew.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
Can I use the same check with any card?
Yes. Preserve the draw’s name, position and orientation. Inspect the corresponding illustration, then record the visible detail separately from any association with your situation.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
Terms in this guide
- Structured card text
- The card fields available to the interpretation, such as its name, orientation, position and keywords.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
- Reader observation
- A detail a person records after opening and inspecting the actual illustration.
Current complete en canonical article ↗Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗
See the claim and source notes
Wenbu describes the model’s tarot input as text fields, including name, orientation and keywords.
模型收到的是牌名、正逆位和关键词
The website uses its own illustrations, so an observation should identify the version the reader inspected.
78 张牌面为原创 AI 插画
The beginner guide recommends keeping the draw details before interpreting them.
Write down the card names, positions and orientations
Sources and review scope
Wenbu drafted and checked this article in Codex. The source list records the scope of the review.
- Current complete zh canonical article ↗Current public original and earlier additions; add substantial coverage without repeating or replacing them. · 2026-11-13 · Fetched text
- Current complete en canonical article ↗Current public original and earlier additions; add substantial coverage without repeating or replacing them. · 2026-11-13 · Fetched text
- Wenbu · calculation conventions ↗First-party implementation; not evidence of predictive accuracy · 2026-11-13 · Fetched text
- Wenbu · tarot beginner guide ↗Existing editorial and worked reading · 2026-11-13 · Read excerpt
- Wenbu · agent protocol ↗Current first-party tool, citation recovery and completion protocol · 2026-11-13 · Fetched text
Open a tarot result and write three short entries
Use any existing result or draw one card. Record its name and orientation, then inspect the picture and describe one thing you see.
Open a tarot result and write three short entries ↗